A nice statement made by an interviewee on Radio 4 yesterday morning:
'It's always misleading to generalise'
Search
Categories
- A Level Philosophy
- Aesthetics Course
- Architecture
- Art and Allusion
- Articles (downloadable)
- Artists
- Beyond Seeing
- Bill Brandt
- Book Reviews
- Books
- Chairs
- Chance-Dream-Desire-Taboo
- Courses
- Critical Thinking
- Current Affairs
- Death
- Descartes
- Downloadable MP3s
- Education
- Erno Goldfinger
- Ethics
- Ethics Bites
- Existentialism
- Free Speech
- Free Speech Course
- Freedom
- Humanism
- Hume
- Internet Philosophy
- Interviews
- Jean-Paul Sartre
- John Stuart Mill
- Kant
- Kierkegaard
- Links to Podcasts
- Machiavelli
- Mind
- Modern Popular Singing
- Multiculturalism
- My Books
- My Favourite Books
- My Widget
- Nietzsche
- Philosophy and Film
- Philosophy Bites
- Philosophy in the Gallery
- Philosophy of Art
- Philosophy of Photography
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy: The Basics
- Philosophy: The Classics
- Philosophy: the Essential Study Guide
- Photographers
- Plato
- Podcasts
- Political Philosophy
- Public Philosophers
- Radio Programmes
- Rawls
- Religion
- Rembrandt
- Russell
- Science
- Seven Ways of Thinking About Art
- Sports
- Sports Ethics
- Study Skills
- Talks
- Tate Modern
- Teaching Philosophy
- The Art Question
- The Basics of Essay Writing
- Thinking from A to Z
- V and A
- Webcasts
- Weblogs
- Wittgenstein
- Writing
- Writing Essays
« Beyond Seeing: Course at Tate Modern Starting June 2007 | Main | Booking Now Open for Tate Modern Course 'Beyond Seeing' »
April 24, 2007
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516cc769e200d834675fac69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Misleading Generalization?:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Philosophy Bites Books
Books by Nigel Warburton
My Other Webpages
My Podcasts
My Art and Photography Weblog
Books I've edited
Books I've Contributed to
Recent Posts
- Treating Evil - philosophical, psychotherapeutic, and legal perspectives, Oxford, 7th June, 2013
- Philosophy in a Weekend
- A Theory of Justice: The Musical
- Who Said Philosophy Isn't Glamorous?
- The Harm in Hate Speech - a review of Jeremy Waldron's book
- Nigel Warburton at Blackwell's Bookshop, Oxford 7pm Wed. Dec. 5th
- Bites Podcasts Links Organised by Theme
- Free Speech Bites podcast launches - a new series for Index on Censorship
- Top 10 Public Philosophers
- A Very Little History of Philosophy
Philosophy: The Classics
Philosophy Bites
Ethics Bites
Philosophy Links
- Philosophy at the Open University
- Teaching Philosophy
- Introduction to Logic
- Institute of Philosophy
- Early Modern Texts
- Public Ethics Radio
- Intute: Philosophy
- Philosophy Conferences Worldwide
- Readings in Modern Philosophy
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
- Big Ideas
- Brian Leiter's Nietzsche Blog
- RIP Events in London
- Royal Institute of Philosophy
- Philosophical Misadventures
- Ethics Updates
- Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library
- Ask Philosophers
- Philosophy Talks in London
- LearnOutLoud: Philosophy
- Ethics Videos Online
- Philosopher's Zone
- Stephen Law - Thinking Big
- Humanist Philosophers Group
- Leiter Reports: A Group Blog
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Philosophy around the Web
- Philosophy Talk
- Philosophy and Ethics
- Denis Dutton - philosophy / criticism / aesthetics / anthropology / commentary / amusements /
Interesting example of a self-undermining statement. Would it be any better if he had said something like, "87.9 percent of the time, it is inaccurate to generalize."?
Posted by: Dwight Schrute | April 27, 2007 at 04:59 PM
87.9% of the time, it is inaccurate to assume that a gender-unspecified person is male.
Ha!
(I wonder if people in the UK know who Dwight Schrute is. I wonder if it's any help to murmur 'Gareth'...)
Posted by: Ophelia Benson | April 28, 2007 at 05:32 PM